Skip to main content

FLEISS' KAPPA CALCULATOR

Fleiss' kappa calculator for three or more raters.

Measure agreement when several raters sort the same subjects into categories. Get Fleiss' kappa, its standard error, z test, 95% CI, kappa for each category and the Landis & Koch interpretation.

DATA

One row per subject

MULTI-RATER

Each column is a category; each cell is how many raters chose that category for the subject. Rows must add up to the same number of raters.

METHOD

Fleiss' kappa formula, worked example, and interpretation

What is Fleiss' kappa?

Fleiss' kappa measures how much three or more raters agree when each classifies the same subjects into categories, after removing the agreement expected by chance. A value of 1 means perfect agreement and 0 means no more agreement than chance. It extends Cohen's kappa, which is limited to two raters.

Formula

κ = (P̄ − P̄e) ÷ (1 − P̄e)

P̄ is the mean proportion of agreeing rater pairs per subject, and P̄e = Σpⱼ² is the agreement expected by chance from the overall category proportions pⱼ. The standard error under H₀ follows Fleiss, Nee and Landis (1979).

Worked example: 14 raters, 10 subjects

The sample data is the classic 10-subject, 14-rater, 5-category example used to illustrate Fleiss' kappa.

  1. Mean observed agreement: P̄ = .378.
  2. Chance agreement from the category proportions: P̄e = .213.
  3. κ = (.378 − .213) ÷ (1 − .213) = .210.
  4. 95% CI [.177, .243], z = 12.37, p < .001.
  5. Interpretation: fair agreement (Landis & Koch).

How to interpret kappa (Landis & Koch, 1977)

  • Below 0: poor (less than chance)
  • .01 – .20: slight
  • .21 – .40: fair
  • .41 – .60: moderate
  • .61 – .80: substantial
  • .81 – 1.00: almost perfect

How to report it (APA style)

“Agreement among the 14 raters was fair, Fleiss' κ = .21, 95% CI [.18, .24], p < .001.” Also report the number of subjects and categories, and kappa for any category with notably low agreement.

References

  • Fleiss, J. L. (1971). Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychological Bulletin, 76(5), 378–382.
  • Fleiss, J. L., Nee, J. C. M., & Landis, J. R. (1979). Large sample variance of kappa in the case of different sets of raters. Psychological Bulletin, 86(5), 974–977.
  • Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174.